Bizarre Descension into Gibberish by TV's Judge Judy is Fourth Such Incident Already: Some Now Say Military Mind-Control Experiments to Blame (video)

The Pentagon rumored to have developed a microwave device able to plant false thoughts and images into the mind of a targeted individual... producing the same sort of reaction we've now seen in four separate occurrences of inexplicable verbal meltdowns on live television...

Video clips of the embarrassing episodes have become internet sensations, but the most recent Judge Judy video is yet to surface on YouTube (Daily Mail):

In four high-profile cases, the latest involving fast-talking Judge Judy, the presenters have started off speaking properly but have then descended into undecipherable nonsense - looking confused and unstable. 

The frequency of the 'attacks' - and the fact that recorded examples of the mental meltdowns have been popular on websites - has led to conspiracy theorists pointing the finger at shadowy government experiments. 

A popular theory being circulated online blames the U.S. Military’s supposed research into using microwaves as a mind control weapon. America has never admitted conducting such research but proponents say the effects - produced by microwave signals stimulating the brain with fake images and voices - exactly mimic those displayed in the recent on-air breakdowns
...

The phenomenon, which has provided internet video sites with some of the oddest footage for months, has now claimed one of America’s most highly paid broadcasters...

Judge Judy -aka Judith Sheindlin- banks $28M/year, and stars in the most watched American daytime TV show. But after being unable to halt her freaky speaking-in-tongues episode last Wednesday afternoon, the celebrity judge said she "didn't feel right"... halted the show... and requested an ambulance.

Most are familiar with the clip of CBS reporter Serene Branson rambling-on incoherently from outside the Grammy Awards ceremony in Los Angeles. She subsequently reported feeling "terrified and confused", with a pounding migraine-type headache that came right out of the clear blue sky (make that brown sky if we're talking LA here lol).  Upon medical examination, it was said she suffered a "complex migraine" whose symptoms "closely mimicked a stroke."- hmmm.

Canadian Mark McAllister -covering the Libyan conflict for the Global Toronto News went into quite a block of nonsensical babble himself, clearly not able to get a grip. Later, the newsman blamed the on-air meltdown on a -again- sudden migraine with no apparent cause: 

Wisconsin reporter Sarah Carlson of WISC-TV was yet another hit by the odd phenomenom. Like the others, she began smooth enough in her TV reportage on Wisconsin’s legal challenge to ObamaCare, but suddenly she began talking gibberish as the camera spun way to a unsettled co-presenter. Carlson is the only one in these cases with any medical history of seizures, but the symptoms largely mimicked those of the other cases.

American psychological warfare capability was derived from that of Nazi Germany, with our own PsyOps initially developed in-concert with their psychological experts, brought back to US in the very same way that V-2 rocket scientists like Werner Von Braun were.

US military research into specific brainwashing and mind control techniques originated in the midst of the Korean war: American officers began to note that a surprisingly large % of US POWs nabbed by the Norks and Chinese defected over to the communists... some remain in Pyongyang to this day. They then discovered the sinister Chinese craft of brainwashing was at play... employing a propaganda and torture program to transform hapless American POWs into loyal communist automatons.

Of course totalist cults/New Religious Movements employ low-tech thought control techniques to great effect, much the same manner as totalitarian regimes... the tightly-choreographed  ObamaMania cult of 2008 surely no exception.

And while such programs are invariably shrouded in mystery and official denials, the CIA and Pentagon is suspected to have studied and experimented with manipulation of human thought for decades- and we all know how they do like their hyper-tech gadgets.

US plans for microwave and focused-energy weapons are common knowledge today... so I sure wouldn't put it past them, actually would be more surprising if they didn't have such a mind control capability in the works.

So, WHY the seemingly-innocuous on-air targets...?  

If this is all true, they've only hit live TV presenters with these invasive microwave zaps... question is: precisely who are the most powerful men in the Pentagon trying to send a message to with this very public display of fearsome technological might?

The Daily Mail (UK)   Wikipedia   Power of the Totalist Cult (RR) 

Judge Judy, Judge judy video, on air meltdown, gibberish, mind control, military, CIA, Serene Branson, pentagon, microwave, implant false thoughts and images, Mark McAllister, Sarah Carlson xxx  Judge judy video,  on air meltdown, gibberish, CIA,  Serene Branson,  Mark McAllister, Sarah Carlson  implant false thoughts and images

SEVEN Former CIA Directors to Obama: The Letter

September 18, 2009

The President
The White House
Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. President:

We have served as Directors of Central Intelligence or Directors of the CIA for Presidents reaching back over 35 years. We respectfully urge you to exercise your authority to reverse Attorney General Holder’s August 24 decision to re-open the criminal investigation of CIA interrogations that took place following the attacks of September 11.

Our reasons for making this recommendation are as follows.

The post-September 11 interrogations for which the Attorney General is opening an inquiry were investigated four years ago by career prosecutors. The CIA, at its own initiative, forwarded fewer than 20 instances where Agency officers appeared to have acted beyond their existing legal authorities. Career prosecutors under the supervision of the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia determined that one prosecution (of a CIA contractor) was warranted. A conviction was later obtained. They determined that prosecutions were not warranted in the other cases. In a number of these cases the CIA subsequently took administrative disciplinary steps against the individuals involved. Attorney General Holder’s decision to re-open the criminal investigation creates an atmosphere of continuous jeopardy for those whose cases the Departement of Justice had previously declined to prosecute. Moreover, there is no reason to expect that the re-opened criminal investigation will remain narrowly focused.

If criminal investigations closed by career prosecutors during one administration can so easily be reopened at the direction of political appointees in the next, declinations of prosecution will be rendered meaningless. Those men and women who undertake difficult intelligence assignments in the aftermath of an attack such as September 11 must believe there is permanence in the legal rules that govern their actions. They must be free, as the Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Senator Lieberman, has put it: “to do their dangerous and critical jobs without worrying that years from now a future Attorney General will authorize a criminal investigation of them for behavior that a previous Attorney General concluded was authorized and legal.” Similar deference needs to be shown to fact-based decisions made by career prosecutors years ago.

Not only will some members of the intelligence community be subjected to costly financial and other burdens from what amounts to endless criminal investigations, but this approach will seriously damage the willingness of many other intelligence officers to take risks to protect the country. In our judgment such risk-taking is vital to success in the long and difficult fight against the terrorists who continue to threaten us.

Success in intelligence often depends on surprise and deception and on creating uncertainty in the mind of an enemy. As President you have the authority to make decisions restricting substantive interrogation or any other intelligence collection method, based on legal analyses and policy recommendations. But, the administration must be mindful that public disclosure about past intelligence operations can only help Al Qaeda elude US intelligence and plan future operations. Disclosures about CIA collection operations have and will continue to make it harder for intelligence officers to maintain the momentum of operations that have saved lives and helped protect America from further attacks.

Finally, another certain result of these reopened investigations is the serious damage done to our intelligence community’s ability to obtain the cooperation of foreign intelligence agencies.

Foreign services are already greatly concerned about the United States’ inability to maintain any secrets. They rightly fear that, through these additional investigations and the court proceedings that could follow, terrorists may learn how other countries came to our assistance in a time of peril. The United States promised these foreign countries that their cooperation would never be disclosed. As a result of the zeal on the part of some to uncover every action taken in the post-9/11 period, many countries may decide that they can no longer safely share intelligence or cooperate with us on future counter-terrorist operations. They simply cannot rely on our promises of secrecy.

We support your stated commitment, Mr. President, to look to the future regarding these important issues. In our judgment the only way that is possible is if the criminal investigation of these interrogations that Attorney General Holder has re-opened is now re-closed.

Sincerely,

Michael Hayden
Porter Goss
George Tenet
John Deutch
R. James Woolsey
William Webster
James R. Schlesinger

___________________________

h/t Good Ole Boy

and Canada Free Press

Cartoonists Having a Field Day...

Is it any wonder? What with so much pent-up demand... good business to be in right about now!

-click on any to enlarge-

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

___________________

-Thanks to Pookie's Toons-

___________________

And Nancy Pelosi is STILL Lying-

It's amazing to me- it appears she can't stop, even if she wanted to.  Some disorder, perhaps?

Pelosi was, of course, caught lying red-handed by the CIA's recent release of documents. These disproved her repeated insistence that she had "never" been briefed regarding CIA waterboarding of terrorists.  

Now that's been exposed as a pile of hooey, the House Speaker's new-and-improved version is that she was only informed that the Bush Administration was "considering" using water-boarding and other techniques... and that they (EITs) were not being used yet.

But even this lame paltering is at odds with the CIA memo dated to September 4th, 2002 that says Pelosi received a "briefing on EITs, including use of EITs on Abu Zubaydah, background on authorities and a description of particular EITs that had been employed." 

Now we learn that a top aide to Pelosi,  Michael Sheehy,  attended a CIA briefing in early 2003in which it was made clear that waterboarding and other harsh techniques were being used  in the interrogation of an alleged al-Qaeda operative, according to documents the CIA released to Congress last Thursday.  I guess "she was never briefed" then, either... Mr Sheehy was.  But the likelyhood that she never discussed what Sheehy was told approximates 0%. Such specious behavior is short of full and sincere good-faith disclosure, to say the least.

Of course, Nancy Pelosi raised no objection to any of the EITs employed by the CIA for almost five long years- until she was Speaker in 2007 and the antiwar left raised it as an issue. Suddenly then, and in the run-up to the 2008 presidential campaign, she's strongly opposed to harsh interrogations, considers waterboarding to be a crime, and/or "knew nothing" about it's previous use- and even went so far as to feign disgust with the Bush Administration for employing such techniques. The sad truth is that Pelosi is obviously willing to lie to the whole country to create a more favorable reality, to answer questions disingenuously, and to intentionally mislead the public- of that there is little doubt.

And apparently Obama and Pelosi forgot a little something: the CIA kills people... it's in their job description. Did these two really think these killers were going to meekly take-one-for-the-team... when the team captain is a lying, incompetent, arrogant nebbish with no real-world experience... who has basically told them they need to kiss his ring? -please

Pelosi is a no-talent hack who's made a lot of enemies. Going to be hard to jive her way out of this one. This is, of course, the very same Nancy Pelosi that told CNN that "there's no pork in the stimulus bill" and that if it wasn't passed, America would "lose 500 million jobs a month". I wonder what color the sky is in her world. And it's going to be amusing to watch how the MSM and the rest of the self-righteous left attempt to cover-up her most recent blatant lies- there is precious little gray area for them to play with here.

Bottom-line is that Queen Nancy's been busted... and that Barack Obama kicked an ant-hill with his ill-advised and politically-motivated release of the Bush Administration's EIT memos.  

Let's have some hearings and get it all out there- shall we? Then watch and see how all the rats scatter that were well-aware of what was going on, and condoned it with their silence for five years... but subsequently demonized George W Bush for such techniques when the interrogations were made public.