Showing posts with label recession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recession. Show all posts

Palin Rocks on Fox


If you caught Hannity's interview with Governor Sarah Palin last night, it's not too hard to see why the left have put so much effort into trying to destroy her.  Not only does Palin make a world of sense,  but -like Dick Cheney- she clearly believes that now is the time to stand-up unabashedly for bedrock Republican principles.  Judging by her chipper self-confidence and charming demeanor, if the leftist MSM and DNC did any damage to Palin's morale over the last 12 mos-- it's surely not showing. 

Sarah Palin foresees conservative Reaganite policies as being the nation's desired antidote in 2012 to Obama's socialist re-make of the United States- as the country will soon be painfully aware of how The One's radical agenda has taken America to the edge of the abyss.

Palin's unshakable belief in what made this country great in the first place -coupled with common-sense arguments against the agenda of today's White House- are precisely what Obama and the DNC don't want you to hear.  They'd prefer to lull you into complacency with specious and vacuous Obama rhetoric that is the political equivalent of the Muzak that they pipe into your dentist's office- and for the same reason, to take your mind off of what's going-on.





HANNITY: What do you make of – look at the state of the economy now...

PALIN: Well, when you consider that the federal government is about eleven trillion dollars in debt, and we’re borrowing more to spend more.. it defies any sensible economic policy that any of us ever learned through college. It defies economy practices and principles that tell ya ‘you gotta quit digging that hole when you are in that financial hole’

Palin continues:

"America is digging a deeper hole and how are we paying for this government largesse. We’re borrowing. We’re borrowing from China and we consider that now we own sixty percent of GENERAL MOTORS – or the U.S. government does… But who is the U.S. government becoming more indebted to? It’s China. So that leads you to have to ask who is really going to own our car industry than in America."

HANNITY: You know but it goes back - It does go back a little to the campaign. I mean, ‘spread the wealth, patriotic duty…’

PALIN: Kind of a ‘we told ya so’.

HANNITY: Well, is that how you feel?

PALIN: That’s how I feel! I feel like… and I think that more and more constituents are going to open their eyes now and open their ears to hear what is really going on and realize ok… Maybe we didn’t have a good way of expressing that, or articulating that message of ‘here is what America could potentially become if we grow government to such a degree that we cannot pay for it and we have to borrow money from other countries, some countries that don’t necessarily like America.

And this many months into the new administration, quite disappointed, quite frustrated with not seeing those actions to rein in spending, slow down the growth of government. Instead Sean it is the complete opposite. It’s expanding at such a large degree that if Americans aren’t paying attention, unfortunately our country could evolve into something that we do not even recognize.

HANNITY: Socialism?

PALIN: Well, that is where we are headed. That is where we have to be blunt enough and candid enough and honest enough with Americans to let them know that if we keep going down these roads… nationalizing many of our services, our projects, our businesses, yes that is where we would head. And that is why Americans have to be paying attention. And we have to have our voices heard. And ultimately it need to be our will, the American people’s will imposed on Washington, instead of the other way around.  
(Transcript- Drudge Report)

Biden is a Dangerous Fool



Although he may have taken Biden aboard as VP in some deal with the DNC, it appears that the opportunistic Obama at least initially had no problem with it- insecure narcissists like and need to be surrounded by fake suck-ups.  The ever-calculating Obama also likely sensed that such an appointment increased his job security... since the nation would cringe at the surreal thought of a gaffe-prone and confused President Joe replacing him.

He was presented to us last year as a seasoned asset for a future Obama Administration, yet the sad fact is that Biden has been consistently on the wrong side of history over the last 30 years... so his DNC-vaunted foreign policy “experience” has little value… this partisan hack doesn’t appear to have learned a thing.


Like Obama, he vehemently opposed the highly-successful Iraq Surge strategy- instead, Biden favored what amounted to surrender, and came-up with a harebrained proposal to split the country 3-ways.  In 2006 he was still calling the Surge "a tragic mistake".  What is clear is that if the Obama Administration were in-charge 4 years ago, Iraq today would be an Al Qaida Caliphate that makes 2001 Kabul look like Disneyland.
In the 1980s, alleged foreign-policy expert Biden opposed every element of Reagan’s defense buildup that peacefully toppled the USSR as “dangerous”- in particular, the vital Pershing II missles to match the Soviets' in Europe.  The Delaware Senator later voted against the first Gulf War in 1991, which would have allowed Saddam to keep Kuwait and control a large chunk of the world’s oil supplies. 

In the 1987 presidential primaries, he not only had plagiarized British Labour leader Neil Kinnock’s speeches wholesale… but actually adopted his entire life story(!), falsely claiming to have been the “first in his family to go to college” and a “coal-miner’s son”.  Back in reality, Biden’s father was a car salesman (no surprise there, Biden looks like the sales manager at a Buick dealer).

And when it comes to gaffes, Biden says incredible things that Sarah Palin would have surely been pilloried mercilessly for... while Joe gets yet another mulligan from the O-bots of the MSM. Typical was how the Biden schooled us all in the presidential campaign last fall regarding how FDR came on television in 1929 to discuss the Depression, as he suggested President Bush should have done-  But unfortunately, 1929 was a year in which there was no President Roosevelt... no Depression... and no television.  

At the height of uncertainty regarding the unfolding financial crisis earlier this year -when the nation was yearning for a confident voice from this new administration- Biden said on camera that the economy was "in danger of really tanking".   Was Obama using him to stir panic in order to pass his reckless stimulus spending package?  Then when met with an uproar, it's "oh, that's just Joe" again?  I wouldn't put it past him-

Inexplicably, Biden is allowed racist slurs, too-  like when he called Obama in the early primaries the first "clean" black politician who "speaks well" to run for president... before he went-on to state that Obama was unqualified.  Biden also said something about not being able to go into a 7-11 convenience store "without an Indian accent"..... and like his boss, Biden finds it appropriate to mock the disabled in public for a few chuckles.

He delivered a nonsensical tirade on Dick Cheney's alleged abuse of power and violation of The Constitution while betraying a shocking, comprehensive ignorance of the Articles himself.  This supposed foreign-policy guru has claimed that we  "kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon" somehow- which of course never happened. And he warned us a few months back that the new president would be "tested" by foreign adversaries, and that we should "gird our loins" for the Obama presidency... huh?.

Some of Biden's most grevious howlers were compiled (below) by the McCain campaign last year.  While Biden's oafishness is often a convenient excuse for this administration, many of these statements appear to be calculated, politically useful prevarication- as it's hard to believe he's actually this ignorant and/or loose with the facts:

1. TAX VOTE:  
Biden said McCain voted “the exact same way” as Obama to increase taxes on Americans earning just $42,000, but McCain DID NOT VOTE THAT WAY.
2. AHMEDINIJAD MEETING: 
Joe Biden lied when he said that Barack Obama never said that he would sit down unconditionally with Mahmoud Ahmedinijad of Iran. Barack Obama did say specifically, and Joe Biden attacked him for it.
3. OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING: 
Biden said, “Drill we must.” But Biden has opposed offshore drilling and even compared offshore drilling to “raping” the Outer Continental Shelf.”
4. TROOP FUNDING: 
Joe Biden lied when he indicated that John McCain and Barack Obama voted the same way against funding the troops in the field. John McCain opposed a bill that included a timeline, that the President of the United States had already said he would veto regardless of it’s passage.
5. OPPOSING CLEAN COAL: 
Biden says he’s always been for clean coal, but he just told a voter that he is against clean coal and any new coal plants in America and has a record of voting against clean coal and coal in the U.S. Senate.
6. ALERNATIVE ENERGY VOTES: 
According to FactCheck.org, Biden is exaggerating and overstating John McCain’s record voting for alternative energy when he says he voted against it 23 times.
7. HEALTH INSURANCE: 
Biden falsely said McCain will raise taxes on people’s health insurance coverage — they get a tax credit to offset any tax hike. Independent fact checkers have confirmed this attack is false
8. OIL TAXES: 
Biden falsely said Palin supported a windfall profits tax in Alaska — she reformed the state tax and revenue system, it’s not a windfall profits tax.
9. AFGHANISTAN / GEN. MCKIERNAN COMMENTS: 
Biden said that top military commander in Iraq said the principles of the surge could not be applied to Afghanistan, but the commander of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force Gen. David D. McKiernan said that there were principles of the surge strategy, including working with tribes, that could be applied in Afghanistan.
10. REGULATION: 
Biden falsely said McCain weakened regulation — he actually called for more regulation on Fannie and Freddie.
11. IRAQ: 
When Joe Biden lied when he said that John McCain was “dead wrong on Iraq”, because Joe Biden shared the same vote to authorize the war and differed on the surge strategy where they John McCain has been proven right.
12. TAX INCREASES: 
Biden said Americans earning less than $250,000 wouldn’t see higher taxes, but the Obama-Biden tax plan would raise taxes on individuals making $200,000 or more.
13. BAILOUT: 
Biden said the economic rescue legislation matches the four principles that Obama laid out, but in reality it doesn’t meet two of the four principles that Obama outlined on Sept. 19, which were that it include an emergency economic stimulus package, and that it be part of “part of a globally coordinated effort with our partners in the G-20.”
14. REAGAN TAX RATES: 
Biden is wrong in saying that under Obama, Americans won’t pay any more in taxes then they did under Reagan.

Joey Plugs is a reckless clown who often says things that betray a major disconnect with reality– and it's not easy to shut him up.  Truly this was a ridiculous choice for Vice-President of the United States, where a few loose words can start wars or crash markets- but like most of Obama's picks, was made for the opportunist's own political security, above all.  As with the appointments of potential 2012 rivals Hillary and Bill Richardson -or obedient partisan toadies like Napolitano- the nation's interests don't weigh very heavy in this president's descision-making process, to say the least.  And Biden was no exception.

Now that we're all stuck with him for awhile, best chain this national embarrassment to a teleprompter every time he heads out the door- before he causes us some real trouble.

Obama to CEOs: "Show Some Restraint"


President Barack Obama said he "made clear" to bank CEOs who visited him Friday that they need to get rid of lavish bonuses and perks that have "angered the American people". 

"Show some restraint," Obama said he told the executives, according to an interview he taped Friday with Bob Schieffer of
CBS News. "Show that you get that this is a crisis and everybody has to make sacrifices.

And these executives should tell this rabble-rousing hypocrite to stuff-it.

Obama takes a private jet to Hawaii for a lavish vacation, spends $18,000/hr on Air Force One to jet-out to the Left Coast and mock the disabled on the Tonight Show (no work more pressing in DC?), cranks-up the White House thermostat to Waikiki, throws garish,  extravagant parties every week while Rome burns... then feasts on $100/lb Wagu Beef on the taxpayers' tab.  

Such behavior is pretty crass when portraying himself as the champion of the oppressed masses- no different than Nancy Pelosi's expecting Air Force planes to be there whenever she snaps her fingers.  But what else should we expect from a President that has tongue-lashed the Detroit automakers repeatedly for not aggressively pursuing hybrids and green technologies... while his last car before heading to the White House was a two-ton, 300hp Hemi-powered Chrysler 300C? How could the President possibly take issue with appearances at AIG- has he no sense of irony?

If it's not appearances, then perhaps it's the actual dollar amounts involved that bother him so much.  But in actuality, -as Charles Krauthammer noted- the AIG bonuses in question amount to  "less than 1/18,500 of the $3.1 trillion federal budget... It's less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the bailout money given to AIG alone."  Seems that this bonus issue is being given attention out of all proportion to it's actual relevance- and for what appears to be political purposes.

Is it the legality that stokes Obama's sense of outrage, then?  Trouble there is that the only way to break a contract legally is Chapter 11....short of that, a contract is a contract. The AIG bonuses were agreed to before the government takeover- and are perfectly legal. These executives salaries, bonuses, and perks were written in stone prior to the crisis, and before Obama got involved... and he's known about all of it long before he saw a political opportunity in feigning "outrage". It should have deeply insulted anyone's intelligence who observed the spectacle of him with a frog-in-his-throat at last week's presser cynically remark "see, I'm choked-up with anger"-

The disingenuous Obama attacks perceived "class enemies" like the cigar-chomping Limbaugh and executives who got their perks and salaries from companies that were glad to provide them in exchange for services and talents... so where is the injustice there that offends him (and his infantile zero-sum economic view) so much? Perhaps one could argue that some of them are "overpaid", especially in the wake of the banking crisis- but that's what the market and the resultant contracts offered them- and they took it. Unlike Barack, they've got actual management abilities and resumes that have real value that someone is willing to pay for... some jealousy there, perhaps?

Someone needs to tell Obama that he can't just keep trashing the business class that made America a powerful machine of innovation and efficiency- nor can he just put all the CEO's on a rack and wring the money from them... regardless of what his wacked-out Marxist professors and Saul Alinsky told him.  There's a reason those losers drove a '74 AMC Hornet and lived in a studio apartment. And, the funny thing about eating-the-rich is... they know when to climb off the plate.

Enough already with calculated, specious drivel about a few million dollars while the Democrats drive this country into the ground with outlandish trillion-dollar spending sprees... the money for which will be drained from these same successful individuals when Obama-Reid-Pelosi crank-up their taxes to dig-out of the hole they're putting us in.  If anyone thinks it's in the nation's interest to discourage our best and brightest from working 15/hrs a day creating wealth and jobs by having them do it for $1/year, while taxing 90% of their bonus away (all the while telling them what bad people they are)- they're nuts. Those with talent and ability will simply abandon companies entagled in the government's draconian tenacles and go work for some boutique firm, offshore if necessary, where there isn't any leveraged job-creation... and they'll do fine no matter what.

The press and public keep taking-the-bait in Team Obama's red-herring attacks on Limbaugh, Cramer, Santorelli, business executives... while they enact a radical agenda with no debate in committee, skipping most standard appropriations proceedings... and breaking all promises for online disclosure prior to legislative votes.  Maybe a little public "outrage" there would be in all of our interests before we gamble our future away on unproven, exorbitant programs that we clearly cannot afford. 

Why aren't we talking about the inordinate spending proposals that Senator Judd Gregg  said "will bankrupt the country"... instead of further enabling the administration's Alinsky-inspired diversionary tactics and demonization of opponents? Said the Senator: "These are staggering numbers and represent an extraordinary move of our government to the left." (thanks Gateway Pundit and Free Republic)

As Barack lays his mojo on us -keeping approximately half the US electorate in the ether- it seems like the invisible hand of the market Obama so abhors is already drawing the line- and it's nowhere near where he wanted it to be.   The recent failed UK bond auctions and calls for an international reserve currency are bringing a harsh reality to Obama's radical spending fantasies, which of course depend on endless borrowing from those who now fear we will devalue our way out of it... or even eventually default. Hopefully the realization is dawning upon the American public that not only do we not have the money... but the day is rapidly approaching when nobody is willing to loan it to us, either. Maybe a decade with the fiscal pedal-to-the-metal isn't such a good idea after all.

It's about time for President Obama to "show some restraint" himself, instead of changing the subject and hectoring useful political targets- and not only in appearance, but in the unfathomable amounts of money he proposes that we borrow and spend, in his disdain for irrepressible market forces, his contempt of legal obligations that run contrary to his desires, as well as his growing disregard for the Constitution of this country.



America, Enjoy Your New Edsel


Americans that voted to bring us "Hope" and "Change" last November have now received the first shiny, new product from Obama-Pelosi-Reid & company... the Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, a so-called "economic stimulus" package consisting of approximately $800B in  profligate spending.  This amount represents a full 6% of US GDP, and is due to rise to well over $1.2 trillion with interest expense... because we're borrowing every cent of it.

It was rushed through  the House, bypassing most standard procedural steps, and with all previous promises of public disclosure abandonded.  A Rasmussen poll last week showed only 37% public support for the legislation in it's final form.  Not one House Republican supported it, and even a dozen Democrats chose not to have their fate chained to this lemon.  The Senate then passed their version of the package with a shameful display of expediency by three GOP Benedict Arnolds- Senators Snow, Collins, and Specter.  The final version was thus signed into law by Obama on Tuesday.


There are no effective economic multipliers for most of this untargeted spending... meaning little leveraged financial growth can be expected.  The Wall Street Journal stated that only 12% of this spendthrift binge could even remotely be considered an economic stimulus. And while Obama promoted it as necessary to address an urgent financial crisis, much of it will take years to work, if ever.  This bill is plainly an opportunistic move by Obama to cash-in on our economic concerns, as well as his own political capital... to trigger an huge increase in the size and scope of government in this country.

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste" said Rahm Emanuel in an unguarded moment- and "We're going to spread the wealth around" said Barack in Ohio last fall.   Indeed-

Besides the lack of proven, effective stimulative spending in the legislation, when it comes to the kind of morale-boosting leadership that could help show us the way out of  this crisis, Obama has already made it obvious that he's no Vince Lombardi.  For a guy who was basking in the triumph of "Hope Over Fear" just three weeks ago, his recent calculated and specious fear-mongering is irresponsible, unhelpful, and appalling.  The president employed this technique in scaring legislators and the public into supporting his spending package, proposing vast liberal programs in the name of "saving us all", and heaping as much blame as possible on  the Bush Administration... while simultaneously dampening expectations for his own results.

With Obama giving us doomsday forecasts on a daily basis, what little hope any of us had for the economy has been extinguished.  His analogies to The Great Depression are not only meant to deceive, they're also inherently reckless. Political brinkmanship consisting of incessant warnings about a pending economic implosion aren't likely to raise consumer or investor expectations any time soon.  This ill-advised tactic has almost certainly hurt consumer confidence, delaying any turnaround in spending habits.  And instead of the MSM calling Obama on his inaccuracies and/or ulterior motives, they continue to kiss his posterior.

Thus, due to the resulting lack of confidence in our near-term economic prospects, Americans will simply sit on any cash that comes their way from this spending program, either saving or paying off debt... regardless of the amount of money thrown at the problem. Note the almost total lack  of economic impact from the Bush "stimulus" passed last year.... while the personal savings rate in the last quarter of 2008 was the highest in six years.

One of the keys to Reagan's economic recovery in the 1980's -when he created 20M jobs and grew the Real GDP by more than 30%- was the sunny optimism he brought to the country with his confident leadership and upbeat, reassuring belief in America.  A most vital factor in our overall economic mood is what the president is saying- so if he badmouths the economy, it tanks.  And if he is bullish and confident, the markets listen... and are more willing to invest in the future.  While Obama is riding a high-tide of support, a little optimism might have done us all a great service... especially in an economic crisis that's rooted in lack of confidence and stability.

Instead, Obama's remarks accentuated the negative, and for political purposes.  Everytime dissappointing data was released, to Team Obama it was a sign of impending doom.  According to their disingenuous narrative, this economy is the worst since The Great Depression.  And without Obama's massive spending bill, we may fall into an abyss from which we will "never recover".  This alarmist propaganda may have been useful to Obama politically, but it's inaccurate historically... and betrays very poor leadership qualities.

Back in reality, our current economic challenges don't even come close to those of the 1930's. Even a comparison to the 1981-82 recession is inappropriate at this point.   Ronald Reagan was handed by the incompetent Carter Administration almost 11% unemployment, plus double-digit inflation and interest rates.  The most recent statistics put the US jobless rate at 7.6%... with low inflation and interest rates approximating zero.  And in The Great Depression, jobs were being lost at double or triple the rate of 2008-2009... hitting a peak unemployment figure of 25.2% in 1932.

Auto production in 2008 was dismal, to be sure... declining by 25%.  But how does that justify Obama's comparisons to 1932, when US production collapsed by 90%?  The failure of a couple dozen banks last year isn't anywhere near the 10,000+ failures of 1933... but you'd never know it from listening to President Obama, out there spreading gloom-and-doom daily to force the passage of his misguided socialist spending spree.  Anyone who expected him to act in the best interests of the country -rather than for his own political security and leftist agenda- must not have paid much attention to how he got this far in the first place.

In bad times, banks also hang-on to their money for fear of making bad loans, no matter how many bailouts come their way.  With consumers also paying-down debt and saving money, the country will be awash with dollars once the economy gets back on it's feet, stoking vicious inflation sure to bring another recession... as the Fed will have no choice but to hike interest rates dramatically to check it.  So Obama's "stimulus" package isn't likely to stimulate much except inflation, and that only once the economy is already improving in the course of the natural economic cycle.


The Democrats have initiated this monstrous spending they know the country cannot afford-  so eye-watering  taxation will surely be on the way... once the trillion-dollar deficits roll-in, inflation is stoked to double-digits, and the dollar is in the toilet.  Thus, forced-upon America will be the liberals' dream of sticking-it to "the rich", deploying a redistributionist agenda through the back door.  This legislation is clearly nothing but a socialist Trojan Horse-  while presented as a bill to help the economy, it's really just a Democratic Party wish-list of liberal social programs, with an extra-helping of pork for all at the table.  Never mind that the millions of Americans making over $150K/yr. that will be soaked to pay for Obama's Marxist-professor-mentors' dreams (plus interest) are largely the job-creating entrepreneurs and small business owners that Reagan famously said are "responsible for almost all the economic growth" in this country.

This legislation will do far more damage than good- and it will hurt recovery by crowding-out private borrowers and consumers as government borrows massive sums to cover the deficit.  It will effect a permanent expansion of government, while forcing the country to  employ massive tax hikes that no sane candidate would ever admit to planning.

Then there's the socialism-by-stealth scheme that was snuck into the bill, to avoid public outrage... if anyone was still wondering why it was not debated in committee, why legislators only had a day to read it prior to the vote, or why it was not published first online....as Obama had promised repeatedly.
  
In an under-the-radar move towards nationalized health care, the "stimulus" package includes $19B to modernize health-care information systems, leading to computerization of all medical records by 2014.  While that's a worthwhile endeavor, and will create quite a few jobs eventually, this centralization of records appears to be laying the groundwork for the establishment of socialized medicine in this country.  The bill also includes another $1.1B for "comparative effectiveness research"- basically studying which treatments work better than others.  This looks disturbingly like a first-step towards prioritizing and rationing treatments in a future one-payer system.  None of these provisions were subject to  any kind of congressional consideration... no committee mark up, no debate on the floor... and of course no public acknowledgement whatsoever.  Both were just buried into the bill, like an earmark.

For all the talk of Obama's first legislative "victory", it showed him lacking the political stature to control Pelosi and Reid... who hit the trough hard, while bickering like siblings.  And the paucity of GOP co-conspirators exposed the president politically... this legislation now looks to be a huge gamble. When all this pork and welfare fails to generate real economic gains, the Democrats could face a bloodbath in 2010.  This is likely to be his first and last chance to get the economy back on-track before the mid-term elections.  Team Obama has bet the farm that this legislation will bear fruit, and quickly-  while historical precedent suggests there's little chance that it will.

"Now, look, I won't lie to you," Obama told a crowd in Florida last week. "If it turns-out that a few years from now people don't feel like the economy's turned-around, that we're still having problems, that folks are still unemployed, that our health-care system's not more efficient, then, you know,  you guys won't applaud me the next time I come down here."  And Obama never avoided calling the "stimulus" package "my bill" while promoting it around the country.  With almost no GOP support for the measure, there is little political cover for Obama if it doesn't work.

The Democrats now seem nervous as their fiscal Frankenstein comes to life... moving in-haste to dampen expectations, while they cover their backsides. Note how the White House initially said the bill would create 3M jobs... then it was 3.5M... as the debate went on, and public  support sagged, it was bumped to 4M jobs.  Now that the legislation has passed, it's already dailed-back to 3.5M new and "saved" jobs (whatever those are)... and "patience" was urged before Obama had even signed it.

Barack's shmoozing of the GOP was supposed to bring "bipartisan" support on the Democrats' terms... but with the strict party-line voting, that part didn't go-to-plan.  Unfortunately for Obama, he now owns this clunker. This legislation likely presages the death-knell of the mindless Obamamania phenomenon... and it won't take us much more than a year or so to find out.